Press the Tab key to go directly to the content of the article

Anthropological Review • Vol. 88(1), 1–11 (2025)

https://doi.org/10.18778/1898-6773.88.1.01

Outer and Inner Canthal Distances and their Stature Estimation Potentials among Nigerian Igbos and Ibibios Residing in Rivers State, Nigeria

Gabriel Sunday Oladipo

logo ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1780-8992
Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria

Emmanuel Afolabi

logo ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6833-1220
Department of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother Hospital (East Kent University Hospitals), Kent, United Kingdom

Bukola Blessing Johnson

Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences, Madonna University, Elele, Rivers State, Nigeria

Oghenefego Michael Adheke

logo ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6306-279X
Department of Human Anatomy, Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Delta University, Ozoro, Delta State, Nigeria

Abstract. Both inner (ICD) and outer canthal distances (OCD) are some examples of facial parameters often applicable in forensic anthropology as these differ among ancestries. Despite numerous reports on stature estimation using various facial parameters across several ancestries and ethnic groups including those of Nigeria, paucity of literature on the potentials of ICD and OCD in the estimation of stature among global populations, including Nigeria, remain evident. Thus, the present study was carried out to fill this gap for two Nigerian ethnic groups, the Igbos and Ibibios. A total of 300 adults of 18 years and above (150 Igbos and 150 Ibibios) comprising 75 males and 75 females each were randomly selected. The ICD and OCD were measured between the medial canthi and lateral canthi of the palpebral fissures of the two eyes, respectively using a transparent metric rule. Stature (height) was measured using a stadiometer using a standardized method. From the results, the mean heights for the combined population of males and females were 180.57±0.74 cm and 175.28±0.65 cm respectively. The differences between sexes for height were statistically significant (p<0.05) while there was no ethnic difference in heights of both ethnic groups observed. The present study showed that the mean ICD in males and females were 3.31 cm and 3.35 cm respectively. The Ibibio males had mean ICD of 3.32 cm compared to 3.29 cm in their females. However, ICD values of Igbos showed a higher mean in females (3.42 cm) compared to males (3.30 cm). The average OCD in males for both ethnic groups were slightly higher compared to females. Significant correlations between ICD, OCD, and stature were observed in both males and females while linear regression equations for stature estimation were derived. For males, it was as follows; Stature = 23.65(ICD) + 102.177, and Stature = 3.44(OCD) + 140.932. For females, it was thus, Stature = 4.38(ICD) + 160.575, and Stature = 2.83(OCD) + 143.518. Conclusively, there were strong associations between both canthal parameters and height in both sexes irrespective of ethnic differences.

Key words: canthal distance, stature, estimation, Ibibios, Igbos, anthropology

Introduction

The identification of individuals using the anthropometry of the human face remains an integral part of biological anthropology. The concept of facial anthropometry in anthropology deals with the measurement of physical components of human face in relation to their racial and ethnic differences (Jahanshahi 2012; Darkwah et al. 2018). Both the inner canthal distance (ICD) and outer canthal distance (OCD) of the canthi (the corners of the eyes where the upper and lower eyelids meet) are important facial measurements that are applicable in both anthropological and forensic studies (Oladipo et al. 2011; Yadav et al. 2019; Bahşi et al. 2021). Furthermore, the understanding of the variations between sexes and ancestries in the assessments of canthal anthropometry could be applied in reconstructive and cosmetic surgeries that usually involve carrying out surgical procedures that are aimed at correcting deformities and enhancing facial aesthetics (Raschke et al. 2013; Bouhadana et al. 2022; Celikoyar et al. 2022). Currently, it is generally accepted that there are morphological differences based on several literature on variations in canthal anthropometry among ethnic groups in Nigeria (Osunwoke et al. 2010; Anibor et al. 2014; Ogoun et al. 2021), and between ancestries globally (Yadav et al. 2019; Bahşi et al. 2021; Radha and Srinivasan 2021; Bouhadana et al. 2022; Ndombolo et al. 2024).

Together with sex, age and ancestry, the estimation of stature is a key biological means of identification in humans (Oladipo et al. 2015; Cunha and Ubelaker 2020). Despite the generalization of knowledge among anthropologists that support the accuracy and reliability of long bones as the most suitable body components for predicting stature across different racial populations (Cunha and Ubelaker 2020), the application of soft tissues in stature prediction has been gaining momentum in recent times. The profiling of unidentifiable human remains by forensic anthropologists to estimate stature using soft-tissue craniofacial measurements has become a common practice by various researchers in the field of biological anthropology (de Acuerdo and de la Cabeza 2015; El-Kelany et al. 2015; Yadav et al. 2019; Bashar et al. 2024). It is worthy of note that there are limited studies on the prediction of stature using canthal anthropometry in non-Negroid populations, and there are arguably none that has been studied using a Nigerian population. In estimating stature from canthal anthropometry, individuals can be positively identified especially in forensic cases where soft tissue remains are incomplete.

In south-southern Nigeria, some of the residents that live in the multilingual city of Port Harcourt (which is in Rivers State) are of Igbo and Ibibio ethnic extractions as the city is bordered by Imo and Akwa-Ibom states, respectively. Arguably regarded as the most populated region within southern Nigeria, Rivers State is not without its challenges that are usually associated with crimes, such drug abuse, human trafficking, and other forms of social vices (Abiodun et al. 2017; Joab-Peterside et al. 2021). These vices could in turn lead to deaths of victims found in such crime scenes thereby posing unique difficulties to local security agencies in trying to identify discovered victims. In high profile forensic cases, local anthropologists are consulted by these security agencies to assist in the forensic identification of the discovered victims – which could be challenging as well due to the lack of forensic databases in the region. Also, in line with studies done by Gao et al. (2024), and Chalkis et al. (2024), surgical outcomes could be affected by anatomical differences in eyelid shape, orbital structure, and overall facial proportions across different racial populations and these variations could in turn impact the selection of techniques and aesthetic consequences in oculoplastic surgeries. The current study was done to investigate the stature estimation potentials of outer and inner canthal distances among Nigerian Igbos and Ibibio adult populations residing in Port Harcourt, Rivers state.

Materials and Methods

A total of 300 adults (150 Ibibios and 150 Igbos) were randomly selected for this study and were limited exclusively to adults of Madonna University, Elele Campus in Rivers State of Nigeria. Minimum sample size was determined using Fisher’s formula for infinite population or population larger than 10,000 (Cocharan 1963). The subjects were from Ibibio and Igbo ethnic origins of Nigeria by both parents and genealogies and were between the age of 18 and 30 years. Subjects with outside age range of 18 and 30 years, those with any form of facial anomalies, prior facial surgeries and those from heterogeneous parents were excluded. Subjects were selected in line with the Declaration of Helsinki research ethics protocols for human research. Ethical clearance was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee of the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Port Harcourt (with registration number NHREC/UPTHREC/03/2023 and protocol number, UPTH/ADM/90/S.11/VOL.XI/1722). All subjects gave their informed consent, and their personal information were kept confidential.

The measurement of inner canthal distance [ICD] and outer canthal distance [OCD] were carried out with the aid of transparent meter rule and recorded in centimeters (cm). The distance between the lateral canthi of the right and left eyes gave the outer canthal distance while the distance between the medial canthal of the right and left eyes gave the inner canthal distance [Figure1]. Height (stature) was measured with the aid of a stadiometer and recorded in cm. Subjects were barefooted (thin socks were also allowed). Subjects were asked to stand on the base of the stadiometer in an erect position. The heels were placed together and arms relaxed at the sides. The head board of the stadiometer was adjusted to the top of the head (vertex) and readings were taken from the calibrations of the stadiometer. 2) All the measurements were performed twice and average of the two scores were used for precision purpose. Reading was taken to two decimal places.

Image shows part of the human face showing eyes looking straight ahead. On the image there are arrows and markers indicating the following distances from left: Palpberai fissure length, inner canthal distance, interpupillary distance, and outer canthal distance
Fig.1. Measurement of inner and outer canthal distances [Oladipo et al. 2011, page 15]

Statistical Analyses

Raw data collected from the subjects were recorded in a Microsoft Excel 2019 version and analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS version 20.0). Differences between sexes and ethnic groups in canthal distances and heights were determined using the independent sample t-test while test of association was done with the aid of Pearson’s correlation and regression analyses. Confidence interval was set at 95%.

Results

The results of the various analyses are presented in table 1 to 8. In the general population [Table1], males had a mean height of 180.57±0.74 cm while females had a mean height of 175.28±0.65 cm. The mean ICD in males was 3.31±0.02 cm while in females it was 3.35±0.02 cm. The mean OCD was 11.52±0.04 cm in males and 11.23±0. 04 cm in females.

Using independent sample t-test to compare the above variables between males and females, it was observed that there was a statistically significant difference in the mean height of males and females (p<0.05) with males showing significantly higher value than females. Also, there was a statistically significant difference between the mean OCD of males and females (p<0.05) with males showing higher mean OCD than females. However, no significant difference was observed between the mean ICD of males and females (p>0.05).

Table 2 contains the results of the ethnic comparison of Height, OCD and ICD between Igbos and Ibibios. The mean heights of the Igbo and Ibibio subjects were 177.87±0.69 cm and 177.98±0.76 cm respectively. Those of ICD were 3.36±0.17 cm and 3.31±0.12 cm respectively while the mean OCD for Igbos and Ibibios were 11.39±0.04 cm and 11.36±0.04 cm respectively. It is worthy of note that the difference in the mean heights of the Igbos and Ibibios were not statistically significant (p>0.05). Also, the mean OCD in the Igbos and Ibibios were not statistically significant (p>0.05). However, there was a statistically significant difference between the mean ICD of the Igbos and the Ibibios (p<0.05) with Igbos showing higher mean value.

Table 3 to 6 show the descriptive statistics for height, ICD and OCD of Igbo males and females, Ibibio males and females, Igbo males and Ibibio males and Igbo and Ibibio females respectively. Regression products of the correlation of height and ICD and OCD are shown in table 7 and 8. It can be observed that Pearson R value for the correlation between height and ICD in males is 0.507. This correlation is statistically significant (p<0.05). Although the correlation between height and OCD in males with R value 0.172 is weak, it is however statistically significant (p<0.05). On the other hand, no significant correlation was observed between ICD and height (R=0.121, p>0.05). In females, there was a weak but statistically significant correlation between OCD and height (R=0.200 p<0.05).

On carrying out the linear regression to obtain the linear relationship between height, OCD and ICD in females, the Pearson constant (C) which indicates the Constant value in a linear equation and the slope (R coefficient) was obtained as shown in table 7. The derived equations follow the linear equation y = mx+c and are represented in table 8. This could be used to determine the height of males and females when the ICD and OCD is measured accurately.

Table 1. Independent T-test Analysis on Height, ICD and OCD in Males and Females
Variables Min (cm) Max (cm) Mean (cm) P-value
Height
Male 157 194 180.57±0.74 0.001
Female 157 194 175.28±0.65
ICD
Male 3.0 3.7 3.31±0.02 0.06
Female 3.0 4.0 3.35±0.02
OCD
Male 10.5 12.0 11.52±0.04 0.001
Female 10.0 12.7 11.23±0.04

P-value is significant at 0.05 when comparing the means of the different parameters

Table 2. Independent T-test on Height, ICD and OCD of the Igbos and Ibibios
Variables Min (cm) Max (cm) Mean (cm) P-value
Height
Igbo 157 195 177.87±0.69 0.91
Ibibio 160 195 177.98±0.76
ICD
Igbo 3.0 4.0 3.36±0.17 0.03
Ibibio 3.0 3.7 3.31±0.12
OCD
Igbo 10.0 12.7 11.39±0.04 0.58
Ibibio 10.5 12.5 11.36±0.04

P-value is significant at 0.05 when comparing the means of the different parameters

Table 3. Descriptive Statistics of Height, ICD and OCD of the Igbo Males and Females
Sex N Minimum Maximum Mean Standard Deviation
Male Height (cm) 75 160.00 195.00 180.40 9.41
ICD (cm) 75 3.00 3.50 3.30 0.17
OCD (cm) 75 10.50 12.00 11.48 0.44
Female Height (cm) 75 157.00 194.00 175.35 6.54
ICD (cm) 75 3.00 4.00 3.42 0.24
OCD (cm) 75 10.00 12.70 11.30 0.61
Table 4. Descriptive Statistics of Height, ICD and OCD of the Ibibio Males and Females
Sex N Minimum Maximum Mean Standard Deviation
Male Height (cm) 75 162.00 195.00 180.75 8.62
ICD (cm) 75 3.00 3.70 3.32 0.21
OCD (cm) 75 10.50 12.00 11.55 0.46
Female Height (cm) 75 160.00 194.00 175.21 9.26
ICD (cm) 75 3.00 3.60 3.29 0.19
OCD (cm) 75 10.50 12.50 11.17 0.52
Table 5. Descriptive Statistics of Height, ICD and OCD of Igbo males and Ibibio males
Ethnicity N Minimum Maximum Mean Standard Deviation
Igbos Height (cm) 75 160.00 195.00 180.40 9.41
ICD (cm) 75 3.00 3.50 3.30 0.17
OCD (cm) 75 10.50 12.00 11.48 0.44
Ibibios Height (cm) 75 162.00 195.00 180.75 8.62
ICD (cm) 75 3.00 3.70 3.32 0.21
OCD (cm) 75 10.50 12.00 11.55 0.46
Table 6. Descriptive Statistics of Height, ICD and OCD of Igbo and Ibibio Females
Ethnicity N Minimum Maximum Mean Standard Deviation
Igbos Height (cm) 75 157.00 194.00 175.35 6.54
ICD (cm) 75 3.00 4.00 3.42 0.24
OCD (cm) 75 10.00 12.70 11.30 0.61
Ibibios Height (cm) 75 160.00 194.00 175.21 9.26
ICD (cm) 75 3.00 3.60 3.29 0.19
OCD (cm) 75 10.50 12.50 11.17 0.52
Table 7. Correlation Statistics for the of OCD, ICD and Height in Males and Females Subjects
Variables r R2 R Coefficient R Constant p-value
Male
ICD 0.507 0.257 23.65 102.177 0.001
OCD 0.172 0.300 3.44 140.963 0.03
Female
ICD 0.121 0.015 4.38 160.575 0.01
OCD 0.200 0.040 2.83 143.518 0.01

Key: r = Pearson correlation coefficient, R2 = coefficient of determination

Table 8. Linear Regression Equations for the Estimation of Height from ICD or OCD in Male and Females
Sex Variable Regression Formula
Male ICD Y = 23.65(x) + 102.177
OCD Y = 3.44(x) + 140.932
Female ICD Y = 4.38(x) + 160.575
OCD Y = 2.83(x) + 143.518

Note: Y = Height (cm), x = ICD (cm) or OCD (cm)

Discussion

It is true that the understanding of the anatomy of the human face brings to light a myriad of applications in the subject fields of ophthalmic, reconstructive, and plastic surgeries, as well as anthropometric evaluations in both forensic and biological identification. As stated earlier, the anthropometric profiling of human subjects by various anthropologists to estimate stature (height) using soft-tissue craniofacial measurements has become a common practice by various researchers in the field of biological anthropology (de Acuerdo and de la Cabeza 2015; El-Kelany et al. 2015; Yadav et al. 2019; Bashar et al. 2024). However, this study is arguably the foremost research that has been done with regards to the relationship between stature, inner (ICD) and outer canthal distances (OCD) for any given Nigerian population.

The present study showed that the mean ICD in males and females were 3.31 cm and 3.35 cm respectively, while the mean OCD in males and females were 11.52 cm and 11.23 cm, respect­ively. A related study done to evaluate the ICD in a Saudi population reported from their results that the mean ICD when the sexes were combined was 3.03 cm (ranging from 2.22 cm to 3.78 cm), with a mean ICD of 3.11 cm for males, and a mean ICD of 2.96 cm for females (Hamid et al. 2021). Earlier, a research by Ozturk et al. (2006) on a Turkish population found that the males and females had a mean ICD of 3.07 cm and 3.03 cm, respectively, while El-Sheikh et al. (2010) reported mean ICD values for a Sudanese population to be slightly higher compared to this present study to be 3.34 cm and 3.24 cm for their males and females, correspondingly. Furthermore, studies done using different south Asian populations by Adhikari et al. (2016), and Iqbal et al. (2024) both revealed similar findings to the present study results on Ibibio population that the males had higher ICD values in association with the female subjects. Within Nigeria, Oladipo et al. (2011) had earlier reported from a survey of 800 participants from Ibibio ethnic group that the ICD of males and females were 3.52 cm and 3.36 cm, respectively – which is in line with the present study that showed that the Ibibio males had a mean ICD of 3.32 cm while their female counterparts had a mean of 3.29 cm. However, the ICD values of the Igbo population in this present study showed a higher mean for the females (3.42 cm) compared to the male counterparts (3.30 cm).

As seen in this study, the average OCD in males for both ethnic groups were slightly higher compared to the female counterparts. These results were in accordance with the studies done among certain ethnicities in Nigeria by Oladipo et al. (2009), Osunwoke et al. (2010), and Anibor et al. (2014). How­ever, in comparisons to other racial populations, the OCD was higher as the mean OCD for a studied population by Rajput et al. (2022) was 9.23 cm for males and 7.31 cm for females while another related study done by Srivastava et al. (2023) using an Indian population noted from their results that the mean OCD was 8.23 cm for males and 7.22 cm for females. Furthermore, similar research done to evaluate OCD using both Indian and Nepalese undergraduate students (Adhikari et al. 2016) revealed that the males had respective higher OCD values (9.49 cm and 9.35 cm) in association with the female subjects (9.13 cm and 9.15 cm) – which agrees with the current study despite reporting higher values in comparison to the south Asian subjects. It could be explained that a host of diverse factors such as changes in lifestyle and dietary habits have had a direct relation to human growth and development over the years and these factors, which are generally population-specific, can affect the morphology and morphometry of the faces among the studied ethnicities.

Suffice it to say that despite that there are some works that has been done to estimate stature (height) using selected facial and nasal parameters (Kumar and Chandra 2006; Kalia et al. 2008; Agnihotri et al. 2011; Wankhede et al. 2012), it has proven to be a challenge to come across studies that have used periorbital (or canthal) parameters to predict stature talk less of a Nigerian population. The applications of both ICD and OCD in stature prediction were shown to be relevant in this study as there were significant relationships between both canthal parameters and height in both sexes irrespective of ethnic differences using the Pearson correlation. These study observations were followed up by deducing linear regressions for estimating the height in males and females based on the measured ICD and OCD values. Although this study was able to establish the significant relationships between stature, ICD and OCD, the researchers recognize that these observations do not make up for a possible generalization of the total population of Nigerian Igbos and Ibibios due to the limited sample size.

Conclusion

The study concluded that there were significant differences in both sexes despite no ethnic differences in terms of stature, ICD and OCD. Also, there were strong associations between both canthal parameters and height in both sexes irrespective of ethnic differences. These study values could assist local ophthalmic, reconstructive, and plastic surgical practitioners who practice in both ethnic regions in managing surgical issues related to the human face. Also, this study could enable local anthropologists and researchers to digress further on analysing the applications of canthal anthropometry in the prediction of stature across different ethnicities in Nigeria, thereby adding to the growth of physical and forensic anthropology in the country.


References

Abiodun AK, George A, Chukwuma AC, Gbenga O, Iluno LU. 2017. Human trafficking: A global challenge reflection on the challenges in Nigeria. J Law Pol Global 61:192.

Adhikari N, Ambekar MN, KC S. 2016. An anthropometric comparison of inner canthal distance, outer canthal distance and canthal index in the Indian and Nepalese undergraduate students of Nepalgunj Medical College. JNGMC 14(2):12–4. https://doi.org/10.3126/jngmc.v14i2.21529

Agnihotri AK, Kachhwaha S, Googoolye K, Allock A. 2011. Estimation of stature from cephalo-facial dimensions by regression analysis in Indo-Mauritian population. J Forensic Leg Med 18(4):167–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2011.02.006

Anibor E, Omokaro E, Ofere F. 2014. Variations in canthal index of the Isokos in Delta state. Int J Basic Appl Innov Res 3(4):143–6.

Bahşi I, Orhan M, Kervancioğlu P, Karatepe Ş, Sayn S. 2021. Craniofacial anthropometry of healthy Turkish young adults: outer canthal, inner canthal, palpebral fissure, and interpupillary distances. J Craniofac Surg 32(5):1906–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000007240

Bashar F, Hossain MS, Akhter N, Sharmeen S, Masum MM, Suma SA, Rahman MA. 2024. Anthropometric Study of Correlation between the Selected Craniofacial Measurements with the Stature in Adult Bangladeshi Manipuri Males. MuMCJ 7(1):19–25. https://doi.org/10.3329/mumcj.v7i1.73962

Bouhadana G, Gornitsky J, Saleh E, Trabelsi NO, Borsuk DE. 2022. Expanding the classic facial canons: Quantifying intercanthal distance in a diverse patient population. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 10(4):e4268. https://doi.org/10.1097/gox.0000000000004268

Celikoyar MM, Pérez MF, Akbaş MI, Topsakal O. 2022. Facial surface anthropometric features and measurements with an emphasis on rhinoplasty. Aesthet Surg J 42(2):133–48. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjab190

Chalkias IN, Lokovitis E, Quaranta G, Kamal M, McMullan T. 2024. Factors that affect eyelid show and their importance in upper eyelid blepharoplasty: a systematic review. Orbit 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/01676830.2024.2398115

Cunha E, Ubelaker DH. 2020. Evaluation of ancestry from human skeletal remains: a concise review. Forensic Sci Res 5(2):89–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2019.1697060

Darkwah WK, Kadri A, Adormaa BB, Aidoo G. 2018. Cephalometric study of the relationship between facial morphology and ethnicity. Transl Res Anat 12:20–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tria.2018.07.001

de Acuerdo PD, de la Cabeza TM. 2015. Prediction of stature according to three head measurements. Int J Morphol 33(3):1151–5.

El-Kelany R, El-Sarnagawy G, Eid G. 2015. Estimation of stature from craniofacial anthropometric measurements in Egyptians and Bengalis samples (a comparative study). Ain-Shams J Forensic Med Clin Toxicol 25(2):24–30. https://doi.org/10.21608/ajfm.2015.18572

Gao T, Guo Y, Rokohl AC, Fan W, Lin M, Ju S, Li X, Ju X, Hou X, Rosenkranz TA, Zhang G. 2024. Racial and sexual differences of eyebrow and eyelid morphology: three-dimensional analysis in young Caucasian and Chinese populations. Quant Imaging Med Surg 15(1):882. https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-24-1113

Iqbal M, Nahar N, Rahman KM, Sultana N, Hossain S, Yeasmin F, Uddin SA. 2024. Anthropometric Study of Orbitonasal Proportion and Their Comparisons in Bangladeshi Buddhist Rakhain Ethnic Males and Females. J Natl Inst Neurosci Bangladesh 10(1):21–5. https://doi.org/10.3329/jninb.v10i1.65450

Jahanshahi M. 2012. Ethnicity and Facial Anthropometry. In Handbook of Anthropometry: Physical Measures of Human Form in Health and Disease (pp. 2535–2542). New York, NY: Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1788-1_157

Joab-Peterside S, Nyiayaana K, Jack JT. 2021. Insecurity in Rivers State: The Issues, Actors and Solutions. In: TM Ebiede, CO Bassey, JB Asuni, editors. Insecurity in the Niger Delta: A Report on Emerging Threats in Akwa Ibom, Bayelsa, Cross River, Delta, Edo and Rivers States. Adonis & Abbey Publishers. 347–433.

Kalia S, Shetty SK, Patil K, Mahima VG. 2008. Stature estimation using odontometry and skull anthropometry. Indian J Dent Res Apr 19(2):150–4. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.40471

Kumar J, Chandra L. 2006. Estimation of stature using different facial measurements among the Kabui Naga of Imphal Valley, Manipur. The Anthropologist 8(1):1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720073.2006.11890926

Ndombolo GB, Milolo AM, Bushabu FN, Kazadi EK, Ntumba PK, Bukama JM, Tshilumba EL, Isouradi JP. 2024. Relationship between Inter Canine Width and Inter Alar Width, Inter Commissural Width, and Inter Canthal Distance: A Pilot Study. OJST 14(6):279–90. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojst.2024.146022

Ogoun TR, Tobia PS, Aye TT. 2021. A comparative analysis of canthal index of Ekowe indigenes, Bayelsa state. World J Curr Med Pharm Res 157–9. https://doi.org/10.37022/wjcmpr.v3i6.204

Oladipo GS, Fawehinmi HB, Okoh PD. 2009. Canthal indices of Urhobo and Itsekiri ethnic groups. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 3(4):3093–96.

Oladipo GS, Akande PA, Osogba IG, Yorkum KL. 2011. Anthropometric studies of inner canthal distance, outer canthal distance and canthal index of adult Ibibios. Asian J Med Sci 3(1):14–6.

Oladipo GS, Ezi G, Okoh PD, Abidoye AO. 2015. Index and ring finger lengths and their correlation with stature in a Nigerian population. Ann Bioanthrop 3(1):18. https://doi.org/10.4103/2315-7992.160742

Osunwoke EA, Elekwa A, Bob-Manuel IF, Ojeka SO. 2010. A study on the normal values of inner canthal, outer canthal, canthal index, interpupillary distance and head circumference of 23–42 years Igbos. Global J Med Sci 9(1&2):43–8.

Radha K, Srinivasan KR. 2021. Anthropometric assessment of canthal distances and canthal index of South Indian region: A cross-sectional study. Med Legal Update 21(1):794–7. https://doi.org/10.37506/mlu.v21i1.2413

Rajput K, Modi V, Kumar K, Yadav CK, Dhin­gra S. 2022. Comparative evaluation of Canthal distances and Canthal index in males and females. NeuroQuantology 20(21):503. https://doi.org/10.48049/NQ.2022.20.21.NQ99060

Raschke GF, Rieger UM, Bader RD, Schäfer O, Schultze-Mosgau S. 2013. Objective anthropometric analysis of eyelid reconstruction procedures. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 41(1):52–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2012.05.011

Srivastava A, Shukla D, Rajput AS. 2023. Comparative evaluation of canthal and cephalic morphomety among males and females. Int J Acad Med Pharm 5(3):192–5. https://doi.org/10.47009/jamp.2023.5.3.42

Wankhede KP, Kamdi NY, Parchand MP, Anjankar VP, Bardale RV. 2012. Estimation of stature from maxillo-facial anthropometry in a central Indian population. J Forensic Dent Sci 4(1):34–7. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.99161

Yadav AB, Kale AD, Mane DR, Yadav SK, Hallikerimath S. 2019. Stature estimation from regression analysis of facial anthropometry in Indian population. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 23(2):311. https://doi.org/10.4103/jomfp.jomfp_140_19

Yadav SK, Malla BK, Srivastava AK, Kumar A. 2019. Anatomical study of canthal index: The morphometrical study. J Kathmandu Med Coll 8(3):136–40. https://doi.org/10.3126/jkmc.v8i3.29718


Final information

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to the participants that contributed to the success of this study.

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that there is no form of competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

GSO was the lead researcher, conceived the concept of the study and design, critical revision of the article for important intellectual content, provided some materials for the study and wrote the manuscript; BBJ provided some materials for the study, performed the data collection, compilation and statistical analysis. EA and OMA provided some materials for the study and carried out some critical revision of the article. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript for publication.

Corresponding authors

Gabriel Sunday Oladipo, Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria; Phone number: +234–8038509591, E-mail: gabriel.oladipo@uniport.edu.ng

Oghenefego Michael Adheke, Department of Human Anatomy, Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Delta University, Ozoro, Delta State, Nigeria; Phone number: +234–8032261520, E-mail: mikeadheke@gmail.com


logo COPE logo Creative Commons

Original article
© by the author, licensee Polish Anthropological Association and University of Lodz, Poland
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Received: 18.12.2024; Revised: 10.02.2025; Accepted: 21.02.2025.