In the Universe of Cassandra: The Ancient Topos of Clairvoyance in the Futuristic World of Minority Report (2002)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/2083-2931.10.09

Keywords:

Cassandra, free will, determinism, Minority Report

Abstract

The figure of Cassandra is well-known from numerous representations in ancient and modern literature as an archetype of a woman who has the power to see the future, but whose visions are not believed. In ancient Greek literature, Cassandra was an important character serving as a prophet of an approaching catastrophe. In her modern adaptations, this figure became a metaphor in psychoanalytical research on human moral behaviour (Melanie Klein and the Cassandra complex) developed in feminist writing. Cassandra has also been of interest to filmmakers, with perhaps the best adaptation of the subject of Cassandra’s clairvoyance being Steven Spielberg’s film Minority Report. Loosely based on Philip K. Dick’s 1956 short story The Minority Report, the plot presents a version of the Cassandra myth, in which a woman together with male twins operate as a group mind to predict future crimes. Their visions are used by the state to prevent the crimes and imprison the would-be criminals. This article offers a thorough analysis of all the ancient and modern features of the metaphor of Cassandra employed in this movie within the overarching framework of the central theme of free will vs. determinism. According to this approach, the central theme is examined with reference to ancient Aristotelian and Stoic moral philosophy, the modern feminist psychoanalysis of Melanie Klein, and the political philosophy and legal issues in the post-9/11 world.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Małgorzata Budzowska, University of Lodz

Małgorzata Budzowska, PhD in Classics, MA in Drama and Theatre Theory, is Assistant Professor in the Department of Drama and Theatre at the University of Lodz. She is Early Career Associate at APGRD, University of Oxford. She is the author of two books: Phaedra. Ethics of Emotions in Euripides, Seneca, and Racine (Peter Lang, 2012) and Sceniczne metamorfozy mitu. Teatr polski XXI wieku w perspektywie kulturowej [Metamorphoses of Myth on Stage. Polish Theatre of the Twenty-First Century from Cultural Perspectives] (WUŁ, 2018), as well as the co-editor of three volumes: Ancient Myths in the Making of Culture (Peter Lang, 2015), Metamorphoses of Ancient Myths (Peter Lang, 2017) and Metateksty i parateksty teatru i dramatu. Od antyku do współczesności [Metatexts and Paratexts of Theatre and Drama. From Antiquity to the Present Day] (WUŁ, 2017).

References

Abrams, Jerold J. “Space, Time, and Subjectivity in Neo-Noir Cinema.” The Philosophy of Neo-Noir. Ed. Mark T. Conard. Lexington: Kentucky UP, 2007. 7–20. Print.
Google Scholar

Aeschylus. Agamemnon. Trans. Herbert W. Smyth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 1926. Print.
Google Scholar

Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics. Trans. H. Rackham. Aristotle in 23 Volumes. Volume 19. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 1934. Print.
Google Scholar

Aristotle. Politics. Trans. H. Rackham. Aristotle in 23 Volumes. Volume 21. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 1944. Print.
Google Scholar

Auger, Emily. Tech-Noir Film: A Theory of the Development of Popular Genres. Bristol: Intellect, 2011. Print.
Google Scholar

Briefly Noted. Rev. of The One Percent Doctrine, by Ron Suskind. Newyorker.com. The New Yorker 3 Jul. 2006. Web. 29 Nov. 2019.
Google Scholar

Burkert, Walter. Greek Religion. Archaic and Classical. Trans. John Raffan. Oxford: Blackwell, 1996. Print.
Google Scholar

Cicero. De Senectute. De Amicitia. De Divinatione. Trans. William A. Falconer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 1923. Print. https://doi.org/10.4159/DLCL.marcus_tullius_cicero-de_divinatione.1923
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/DLCL.marcus_tullius_cicero-de_divinatione.1923

Conard, Mark T. “Introduction.” The Philosophy of Neo-Noir. Ed. Mark T. Conard. Lexington: Kentucky UP, 2007. 1–4. Print.
Google Scholar

Cooper, M. G. “The Contradictions of Minority Report.” Film Criticism 28.2 (2003): 24–41. Print.
Google Scholar

Hardwick, Lorna, and Stephen Harrison. “Introduction.” Classics in the Modern World. A ‘Democratic Turn’? Ed. Lorna Hardwick and Stephen Harrison. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2013. XIX–XXXVII. Print. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199673926.001.0001
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199673926.001.0001

Klein, Melanie. “Some Reflections on The Oresteia.” Envy and Gratitude—and Other Works 1946–1963. London: Vintage, 1997. 275–99. Print.
Google Scholar

“Mansplaining.” Merriam-webster.com. Merriam-Webster March 2018. Web. 29 Nov. 2019.
Google Scholar

Minority Report. Dir. Steven Spielberg. Perf. Tom Cruise, Samantha Morton. Twentieth Century Fox, 2002. DVD.
Google Scholar

O’Connor, Timothy, and Christopher Franklin. “Free Will.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2020 Edition). Ed. Edward N. Zalta. Forthcoming. Plato.stanford.edu. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Web. 28 Nov. 2019.
Google Scholar

Rogers, Brett M., and Benjamin E. Stevens. “Introduction: The Past is Undiscovered Country.” Classical Traditions in Science Fiction. Ed. Brett M. Rogers and Benjamin E. Stevens. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2015. 1–24. Print.
Google Scholar

Seneca, Lucius Annaeus. “Epistula CVII.” Moral Letters to Lucilius (Epistulae morales ad Lucilium). Trans. Richard M. Gummere. Volume 3. London: Heinemann, 1925. Print.
Google Scholar

Solnit, Rebecca. “Cassandra Among the Creeps.” Harper’s Magazine 329 (1973): 4–9. Ezproxy.library.ubc.ca. University of British Columbia Library Oct. 2014. Web. 25 Nov. 2019.
Google Scholar

Virgil. Aeneid. Trans. Theodore C. Williams. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1910. Print.
Google Scholar

Wolf, Christa. Cassandra: A Novel and Four Essays. Trans. Jan van Heurck. New York: Farrar, Strauss & Giroux, 1983. Print.
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2020-11-24

How to Cite

Budzowska, M. (2020). In the Universe of Cassandra: The Ancient Topos of Clairvoyance in the Futuristic World of Minority Report (2002). Text Matters: A Journal of Literature, Theory and Culture, (10), 151–165. https://doi.org/10.18778/2083-2931.10.09