Reframing Patient’s Autonomy in End-of-Life Care Decision-Making: Constructions of Agency in Interviews with Physicians

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.17.2.04

Keywords:

Advance Directives, Patient’s Autonomy, Bioethics, Frame Analysis, Agency, End-of-Life Care, Finland

Abstract

In the research literature, critical viewpoints question the idea of patient autonomy as a robust basis for approaching end-of-life treatments. Yet physicians express distinctly positive attitudes towards patient autonomy and advance directives in questionnaire studies. In this article, we unravel taken-for-granted assumptions about the agency that physicians use when evaluating patient autonomy in end-of-life care. We use Goffmanian frame analysis to analyze semi-structured interviews with eight Finnish physicians. Instead of measuring standardized responses, we explore in detail how distinct evaluations of patient autonomy are made through approving or reserved stand-taking. The results show that the interviewees reframed patient autonomy with the help of biological, medical, ethical, and interaction frames. Through such reframing, the patient’s agency was constructed as vulnerable and weak in contrast to the medical expert with the legitimated capacity to act as an agent for the patient. Further, end-of-life treatment decisions by the patient, as well as the patient’s interests appeared as relationally defined in interactions and negotiations managed by the physician, instead of attesting the sovereign agency of an autonomous actor.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

André Buscariolli, University of California, Santa Barbara, USA

André Buscariolli is a graduate student at UC Santa Barbara interested in conversation analysis, ethnomethodology, and microsociology. He examines how phenomena attributed to psychological mechanisms (mental illness, emotions, etc.) relate to the organization of social encounters. He also draws from ethnomethodology, critical data studies, science and technology studies to discuss how law enforcement personnel interpret and incorporate big data evidence in police investigations.

Kari Mikko Vesala, University of Helsinki, Finland

Kari Mikko Vesala is a senior lecturer of social psychology at the Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, Finland. His research interests are focused on qualitative methodology and relational theories of agency. Current empirical topics in the research he conducts include, among others, well-being and agency beliefs among farmers and small business owners, as well as related entrepreneurship discourses and policies.

References

Andorno, Roberto, Nikola Biller-Andorno, and Susanne Brauer. 2009. “Advance Health Care Directives: Towards a Coordinated European Policy?” European Journal of Health Law 16(3):207-227.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/157180909X453053

Andreasen, Paula et al. 2019. “Advance Directives in European Long-Term Care Facilities: A Cross-Sectional Survey.” BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care. Retrieved February 17, 2021 https://spcare.bmj.com/content/early/2019/05/21/bmjspcare-2018-001743
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2018-001743

Auriemma, Catherine L. et al. 2014. “Stability of End-of-Life Preferences: A Systematic Review of the Evidence.” JAMA Internal Medicine 174(7):1085-1092.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.1183

Bandura, Albert. 2006. “Toward a Psychology of Human Agency.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 1(2):164-180.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00011.x

Billig, Michael. 1996. Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Clarke, Adele E. et al. 2003. “Biomedicalization: Technoscientific Transformations of Health, Illness, and U.S. Biomedicine.” American Sociological Review 68(2):161-194.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1519765

Coleman, Albert M. E. 2013. “Physician Attitudes toward Advanced Directives: A Literature Review of Variables Impacting on Physicians Attitude toward Advance Directives.” American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine 30(7):696-706.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049909112464544

Conrad, Peter. 1979. “Types of Medical Social Control.” Sociology of Health & Illness 1(1):1-11.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.ep11006751

Conrad, Peter. 1992. “Medicalization and Social Control.” Annual Review of Sociology 18:209-232.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.18.080192.001233

Conrad, Peter and Joseph W. Schneider. 1980. “Looking at Level of Medicalization: A Comment on Strong’s Critique of the Thesis of Medical Imperialism.” Social Science & Medicine. Part A: Medical Psychology & Medical Sociology 14(1):75-79.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-7123(80)90804-4

Ditto, Peter. H., Nikki A. Hawkins, and David A. Pizarro. 2006. “Imagining the End of Life: On the Psychology of Advance Medical Decision Making.” Motivation and Emotion 29(4):475-496.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9017-x

Dresser, Rebecca S. 2003. “Precommitment: A Misguided Strategy for Securing Death with Dignity.” Texas Law Review 81(7):1823-1847.
Google Scholar

Eberly, Marion B. et al. 2011. “Beyond Internal and External: A Dyadic Theory of Relational Attributions.” Academy of Management Review 36(4):731-753.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2011.65554734

Emirbayer, Mustafa. 1997. “Manifesto for a Relational Sociology.” American Journal of Sociology 103(2):281-317.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/231209

Emirbayer, Mustafa and Ann Mische. 1998. “What Is Agency?” American Journal of Sociology 103(4):962-1023.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/231294

Ensink, Titus. 2003. “The Frame Analysis of Research Interviews: Social Categorization and Footing in Interview Discourse.” Pp 156-177 in Analyzing Race Talk: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on the Research Interview, edited by H. van der Berg, M. Wetherell, and H. Houtkoop-Steensrta. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489792.011

Fagerlin, Angela and Carl E. Schneider. 2004. “Enough. The Failure of the Living Will.” Hasting Center Report 34(2):30-41.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3527683

Finnish Social Science Data Archive. 2016. Processing Qualitative Data Files. Retrieved January 21, 2017 http://www.fsd.uta.fi/aineistonhallinta/en/processing-qualitative-data-files.html
Google Scholar

Frank, Gelya et al. 1998. “A Discourse on Relationships in Bioethics: Patient Autonomy and End-of-Life Decision Making Among Elderly Korean Americans.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 12(4):403-423.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/maq.1998.12.4.403

Freidson, Eliot L. 1970. Profession of Medicine: A Study of the Sociology of Applied Knowledge. New York: Dodd, Mead & Company.
Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1986. Frame Analysis. An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
Google Scholar

Hawkins, Nikki A. et al. 2005. “Micromanaging Death: Process, Preferences, Values, and Goals in End-of-Life Care Medical Decision Making.” The Gerontologist 45(1):107-117.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/45.1.107

Hildén, Hanna-Mari, Pekka Louhiala, and Jorma Palo. 2004. “End of Life Decisions: Attitudes of Finnish Physicians.” Journal of Medical Ethics 30(4):362-365.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2002.001081

Kiesler, Donald J. and Stephen M. Auerbach. 2006. “Optimal Matches of Patient Preferences for Information, Decision-Making and Interpersonal Behavior: Evidence, Models and Interventions.” Patient Education and Counseling 61(3):319-341.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2005.08.002

Kuczewski, Mark G. 1996. “Reconceiving the Family: The Process of Consent in Medical Decision-Making.” The Hasting Center Report 26(2):30-37.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3528574

Laine, Christine and Frank Davidoff. 1996. “Patient-Centered Medicine: A Professional Evolution.” JAMA 275(2):152-156.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.275.2.152

Légaré, France et al. 2010. “Interventions for Improving the Adoption of Shared Decision Making by Healthcare Professionals.” Cochrane Systematic Review 12(5):CD006732.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub2

Lidz, Charles W. and Robert M. Arnold. 1993. “Rethinking Autonomy in Long Term Care.” University of Miami Law Review 47(3):603-623.
Google Scholar

Lopéz, José. 2004. “How Sociology Can Save Bioethics… Maybe.” Sociology of Health & Illness 26(7):875-896.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0141-9889.2004.00421.x

Manning, Philip. 1992. Erving Goffman and Modern Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2075701

Meyer, John W. and Ronald L. Jepperson. 2000. “The ‘Actors’ of Modern Society: The Cultural Construction of Social Agency.” Sociological Theory 18(1):100-120.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2751.00090

Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, Finland. 1992. The Act on the Status and Rights of Patients. Retrieved August 24, 2019 https://www.valvira.fi/web/en/healthcare/patient_rights
Google Scholar

Niska, Miira. 2015. Who Is Serving Whom? An Agency-for Perspective on Enterprise Promotion in Rural Finland. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
Google Scholar

Pesonen, Heikki and Kari M. Vesala. 2007. “Rural Development as a Frame Analytic Challenge for Religious Communities: The Case of Rural Parishes of the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Finland.” Social Compass 54(2):281-293.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0037768607077045

Pollard, Lorraine et al. 2014. “The Impact of Patient Participation Direct Enhanced Service on Patient Reference Groups in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study.” Quality in Primary Care 22(4):189-199.
Google Scholar

Pyysiäinen, Jarkko. 2010. “Co-Constructing a Virtuous Ingroup Attitude? Evaluation of New Business Activities in a Group Interview of Farmers.” Text & Talk. An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies 30(6):701-721.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2010.034

Rose, Nikolas. 2013. “Personalized Medicine: Promises, Problems and Perils of a New Paradigm for Healthcare.” Procedia— Social and Behavioral Sciences 77:341-352.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.03.092

Ross, Lee. 1977. “The Intuitive Psychologist and His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 10(C):173-220.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60357-3

Scheff, Thomas. 2005. “Deciphering ‘Frame Analysis.’” Sociological Theory 23(4):368-385.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0735-2751.2005.00259.x

Shapiro, Susan P. 2015. “Do Advance Directives Direct?” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 40(3):487-530.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-2888424

Shapiro, Susan P. 2018. “Standing in Another’s Shoes: How Agents Make Life-and-Death Decisions for Their Principals.” Academy of Management Perspectives 30(4):404-427.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0158

Sharman, Stefanie J. et al. 2008. “False Memories for End-of-Life Decisions.” Health Psychology: Official Journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association 27(2):291-296.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.27.2.291

Sharron, Avery. 1981. “Frame Paralysis: When Time Stands Still.” Social Research 48(3):500-520.
Google Scholar

Stock, Paul V. and Jérémie Forney. 2014. “Farmer Autonomy and the Farming Self.” Journal of Rural Studies 36:160-171.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.07.004

Tannen, Deborah. 1993. Framing in Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Tannen, Deborah and Cynthia Wallat. 1987. “Interactive Frames and Knowledge Schemas in Interaction: Examples from a Medical Examination/Interview.” Social Psychology Quarterly 50(2):205-216.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2786752

Timmermans, Stefan. 2005. “Death Brokering: Constructing Culturally Appropriate Deaths.” Sociology of Health and Illness 27(7):993-1013.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2005.00467.x

Vesala, Kari M., Alistair R. Anderson, and Hannu T. Vesala. 2017. “Interactions and Entrepreneurial Agency. A Relational View of Entrepreneurs’ Control Cognitions.” Archives of Psychology 1 (1). Retrieved March 27, 2019 https://archivesofpsychology.org/index.php/aop/article/view/11/28
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2021-04-30

How to Cite

Buscariolli, A., & Vesala, K. M. (2021). Reframing Patient’s Autonomy in End-of-Life Care Decision-Making: Constructions of Agency in Interviews with Physicians. Qualitative Sociology Review, 17(2), 70–87. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.17.2.04

Issue

Section

Articles