Warsztaty pisania – ich znaczenie dla uczących się języka angielskiego

Autor

  • Juan J. Araujo Texas A&M University-Commerce, Department of Curriculum and Instruction
  • Carol D. Wickstrom University of North Texas, College of Education

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0860-7435.24.06

Słowa kluczowe:

pisanie, rozwój zawodowy, edukacja nauczycieli, młodzież, nauka języka angielskiego

Abstrakt

Korzystając z naturalistycznej, jakościowej metodologii w artykule zaprezentowane zostaną działania dwóch nauczycieli języka angielskiego w szkole średniej, angażujących się w zaspokajanie potrzeb młodzieży w zakresie nauczania języka. Wnioski sugerują, że najbardziej efektywnymi metodami nauki i osiągania sukcesu przez uczniów są: znajomość źródeł, opieranie się na wiedzy językowej, poświęcenie czasu na wybór odpowiednich książek i aktywności, wyraźne formułowanie zasad rządzących warsztatem pisarskim, a także traktowanie pisania jako czynności nierozerwalnie połączonej z myśleniem.

Pobrania

Brak dostępnych danych do wyświetlenia.

Bibliografia

Applebee, Arthur N. & Langer, Judith A. (2013). Writing instruction that works: Proven methods for middle and high school classrooms. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Google Scholar

Araujo, Juan (2013). Expanding the learning zone: Decisions that transform the practices of two English language arts teachers. 35th Association of Literacy Educators and Researchers Yearbook, (pp. 87–107). Louisville, KY: Association of Literacy Educators and Researchers.
Google Scholar

Atwell, Nancie (1987). In the middle: Writing, reading, and learning with adolescents . Montclair, NJ: Boynton & Cook Publishers.
Google Scholar

Baker, Colin (2008). Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Google Scholar

Ball, Arnetha F. (2006). Teaching writing in culturally diverse classrooms. In: C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research, (pp. 293–310). New York, NY: The Guildford Press.
Google Scholar

Brophy, Jere E. & Good, Thomas L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In: M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching, 3rd edition, (pp. 328–375). New York: McMillan.
Google Scholar

Burke, Carolyn & Harste, Jerome & Short, Kathy (1995). Creating classrooms for authors and inquirers. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Google Scholar

Ciardiello, Angelo V. (1998). Did you ask a good question today? Alternative cognitive and metacognitive strategies. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 43, 2, 210–219.
Google Scholar

Cisneros, Sandra (1984). The house on Mango Street. New York, NY: Arte Publico Press.
Google Scholar

Collins, Suzanne (2008). The hunger games. New York, NY: Scholastic Press.
Google Scholar

Common Core State Initiative Standards (2015). English language arts standards: Writing 9–10. Retrieved from: http://www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy/W/9-10/
Google Scholar

Creswell, John W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches. New Berry Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Google Scholar

Delpit, Lisa (1987). Skills and other dilemmas of a progressive black educator. Equity and Choice, 3, 2, 9–14.
Google Scholar

Dewey, John (1910). Science as subject-matter and as method. Science, 31, 121–127.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.31.787.121

Edelsky, Carole (1986). Writing in the bilingual program: Habia una vez. Norwood: NJ. Abex.
Google Scholar

Englert, Carol S. & Mariage, Troy V. & Dunsmore, Kailonnie (2010). Tenets of sociocultural theory in writing instruction. In: C. A. MacActhur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of Writing Research, (pp. 208–221). New York: Guilford Press.
Google Scholar

Freire, Paulo (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. NY: Continuum.
Google Scholar

Fu, Danling (2009). Writing between languages: How English language learners make the trans ition to fluency. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Google Scholar

Gallagher, Kelly (2006). Teaching adolescent writers. NY: Stenhouse Publications.
Google Scholar

Gambrell, Linda B. & Malloy, Jacquelynn A. & Mazzoni, Suzan A. (2011). Evidenced based best practices for comprehensive literacy instruction. In: L. B. Gambrell, L. M. Morrow (Eds.), Best practices in literacy instruction, 4th edition, (pp. 11–36). New York, NY: Guilford.
Google Scholar

Gonzales, Linda Northcutt & Watson, Daniel (1986). Sheltered English teaching handbook. Carlsbad, CA: Northcutt, Watson, and Gonzalez.
Google Scholar

Graham, Steve & Perin, Dolores (2007). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high school. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
Google Scholar

Holdaway, Don (1979). The foundations of literacy. New York, NY: Ashton Scholastic.
Google Scholar

Homer (1996) The Odyssey. (R. Fagles, Trans.). New York, NY: Penguin Books.
Google Scholar

Krashen, Stephen D. (1987). Principles and practices in second language acquisition. Prentice Hall International.
Google Scholar

Kwok, Michelle N. & Ganding, Exequiel & Hull, Glynda A. & Moje, Elizabeth B. (2016). Sociocultural approaches to high school instruction: Examining the roles of context, positionality, and power. In: C. A. MacActhur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of Writing Research, 2nd edition, (pp. 257–271). New York: Guilford Press.
Google Scholar

McCarthey, Sarah & Mkhize, Dumisile (2013). Teachers' orientations towards writing instruction. Journal of Writing Research, 4, 4, 1–33.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2013.05.01.1

Merriam, Sharan B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar

Moll, Luis C. & Amanti, Cathy & Neff, Deborah & Gonzalez, Norma (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31, 2, 132–141.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849209543534

Moll, Luis C. (1989). Teaching second language students: A Vygotskian perspective. In: D. Johnson & S. Roen (Eds.), Richness in writing, (pp. 57–69). NY: Longman.
Google Scholar

National Assessment of Educational Progress (2011). The nation’s report card: Writing 2011. Retrieved from: http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/main2011/2012470.pdf
Google Scholar

Patterson, Leslie & Wickstrom, Carol & Roberts, Jennifer & Araujo, Juan, & Hoki, Chieko (Winter 2010). Deciding when to step in and when to back off: Culturally mediated writing instruction for adolescent English language learners. The Tapestry Journal, 2, 2, p. 1–28.
Google Scholar

Patton, Michael Q. (2001). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Google Scholar

Peregoy, Suzanne F. & Boyle, Owen F. (2012). Reading, writing and learning in ESL: A resource book (6th edition). Boston, MA: Pearson Publications.
Google Scholar

Rosenblatt, Louise M. (2004). The transactional theory of reading and writing. In: R. B. Rudell, N. J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading, 5th edition, (pp. 1363–1398). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Google Scholar

Salinger, Jerome D. (1951). Catcher in the rye. New York, NY: Little Brown and Company.
Google Scholar

Shavelson, Richard J. (1973). The basic teaching skill: Decision-making. Stanford, CA: Stanford University School of Education Center for R & D Teaching.
Google Scholar

Texas Education Agency (2013). Writing scores for end of course exams for fall 2012. Retrieved from: http://www.tea.state.tx.us/student.assessment/staar/rpt/sum/yr13/
Google Scholar

Vygotsky, Lev S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar

Wickstrom, Carol & Araujo, Juan & Patterson, Leslie (with Hoki, Chieko, & Roberts, Jennifer) (2011). Teachers prepare students for careers and college: “I see you”, therefore I can teach you. In: P. Dunston, K. H. Gambrell, P. Stecker, S. Fullerton, V. Gillis, & C. C. Bates (Eds.), 60th Literacy Research Association Yearbook, (pp. 113–126). Oak Creek, WI: Literacy Research Association.
Google Scholar

Wilhelm, Jeffrey D. (2007). Engaging readers and writers with inquiry: Promoting deep unde rstandings in language arts and content areas with guiding questions. New York: Scholastic.
Google Scholar

Opublikowane

2017-06-30

Jak cytować

Araujo, J. J., & Wickstrom, C. D. (2017). Warsztaty pisania – ich znaczenie dla uczących się języka angielskiego. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Librorum, 1(24), 77–96. https://doi.org/10.18778/0860-7435.24.06

Numer

Dział

Articles